What the Research Tells Us

Research indicates that Structured Word Inquiry can significantly improve literacy outcomes, especially for readers and spellers who struggle.

By embracing SWI, educational institutions can offer a more comprehensive and practical approach to literacy instruction, ultimately supporting improved reading and spelling outcomes for all students.

Effectiveness for Poor Readers and Spellers: A randomized controlled trial evaluated the impact of SWI on students with reading and spelling difficulties. The study found that SWI improved literacy skills, suggesting its potential as an effective intervention for struggling learners.

Impact on Persistently Poor Readers: Research examining the effects of SWI on Grade 3 students who were persistently poor readers demonstrated that SWI interventions resulted in gains in reading and spelling skills. This highlights SWI's role in supporting students who have not responded to traditional literacy instruction methods.

Comprehensive Literacy Development: SWI's focus on systematically investigating word structures through morphology, etymology, and phonology contributes to a deeper understanding of word meanings and relationships. This approach promotes vocabulary development and higher-order language skills essential for reading comprehension and overall literacy.

Implications for Education Policy and Reform

The positive outcomes associated with SWI suggest that incorporating this approach into literacy instruction can address some of the challenges struggling readers and spellers face.

Education stakeholders, consider the following actions:

Professional Development: Provide training for educators on SWI methodologies to ensure effective implementation in the classroom.

Curriculum Integration: Integrate SWI principles into existing literacy curricula to enhance students' understanding of word structures and meanings.

Research Dissemination: Share findings from SWI studies with educators, policymakers, and the broader educational community to inform evidence-based practices.